Exploring the Protection Against Confused Deputy Problem by Capability-Based Security Systems

Is there any other security weakness that I should know about? The solution is that an intruder must breach the server network and either discover the app secret or intercept the network traffic from the server to Google (which is secured by HTTPS) in order to acquire the access token if they wish to steal user access tokens from an application using code flow. In order to give users more control over files without granting root access, ACLs are used.


As per the information available on Wikipedia at the following link (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confused_deputy_problem):

The significance of capability systems in information security is highlighted by the
confused deputy
issue, which serves as an example of why
security is crucial. Unlike access control list-based systems, capability systems offer protection against this issue.

Regardless of the security system in use, an adversary could always potentially deceive a privileged program into utilizing its privilege. This trickery can happen whether the privilege is derived from a capability or based on Access Control Lists (ACLs) and the ambient authority of the requesting program. So, why is this the case?


To some extent, your statement is accurate. Typically, the main issue lies in the fact that the subject who is being abused has vast authority that is not limited. However, if the subject’s actions were solely based on their abilities, it would limit the abuse.

Frequently Asked Questions

Posted in Uncategorized